Windows validating parser software sax

For pugixml the compromise is as follows: any well-formed document often has to be transformed in certain ways by the time it reaches the user.

The transformations include end-of-line handling, attribute-value normalization and character reference expansion.

Whichever way you interpreted the requirement, it wasn’t met.

In fact, it took Larry Wall more than a couple of months just to add the Unicode support to Perl that XML assumed.

Are there any other tools,libraries, strategies for validating a larger than normal XML file?

EDIT: The SAX solution worked for java validation, but the other two suggestions for the libxml tool were very helpful as well for validation outside of java.

as an underlying format for application data model more preferable.

This chapter describes various performance tricks that allowed the author to write a very high-performing parser in C : pugixml.

They can be used as static configuration files for Web applications, such as in Java Web applications or web.config in Microsoft® ASP. XML is also an ideal method of data transfer between platforms and languages because of its simple, universally readable structure.While the techniques were used for an parser, most of them can be applied to parsers of other formats or even unrelated software (e.g., memory management algorithms are widely applicable beyond parsers).Since there are several substantially different approaches to syntax while validating parsers can check data semantics as well).In order to avoid the difficulties inherent in parsing raw XML input, almost all programs that need to process XML documents rely on an XML parser to actually read the document.The parser is a software library (in Java it’s a class) that reads the XML document and checks it for well-formedness.

Leave a Reply